Connecticut advocates are calling on the General Assembly to pass the state's Voting Rights Act.
The bill would enshrine the protections of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, and eliminate certain barriers to voting specific to Connecticut.
The bill would provide new legal tools to fight discriminatory voting rules, expand language assistance for voters with limited English, and adopt strong protections against voter intimidation.
Jess Zaccagnino, policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, described how the bill's pre-clearance program aims to handle voting rights problems before they happen.
"This program would basically put the burden on local governments," said Zaccagnino, "where there are records of discrimination and that's set out in a formula in the bill to prove that certain changes they would make to their election procedures wouldn't harm voters of color or other protected groups before those changes could go into effect."
The bill was introduced in the General Assembly during the 2022 Legislative Session, but never advanced out of committee.
During a public hearing this year, some people said this legislation only makes voting more complicated, albeit less reliable. Others feel the bill is too broad and tears down federal protections.
It has been filed with the Legislative Commissioners' Office.
Beyond this bill, Zaccagnino noted that there are other ways to strengthen voting in the state. In particular, she said the state needs to pass an early voting plan, and expand absentee voting.
But, the biggest challenge to getting the state's voting rights act passed is time - since the General Assembly is part-time.
"We need to advocate to our legislators that the Voting Rights Act is a bill that is worth being taken up on the House and Senate floor, which you know, I absolutely believe it is," said Zaccagnino. "And make sure that the bill gets brought up, not towards the end of session, because if it does get brought up in the last week or two it really sharply restricts its chances of passing."
While the bill has had a great deal of support, she noted that opposition has mostly come in the form of people feeling this legislation isn't necessary.
But, Zaccagnino pointed to Connecticut's long history of voter discrimination, considering it was the first state to require literacy tests.
get more stories like this via email
In a blow to free speech and the right to assemble, the U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case involving the rights of protest organizers in Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.
McKesson v. Doe stemmed from protests over the 2016 police killing of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. A protest organizer faced charges after a police officer was injured by the actions of an unknown protester.
Cicley Gay, board chairwoman of the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, said an opinion by the Fifth Circuit now stands, allowing an organizer to be held liable for the individual actions of others at a protest based on negligence.
"This case without question infringes upon all of our First Amendment rights," Gay contended. "It's incumbent upon us to reject its premise and its intention, which is, frankly, to scare champions of justice and organizers away from mass protest."
The Fifth Circuit covers Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas, and Gay noted the First Amendment still protects the right to assembly. Black Lives Matter protests have attracted diverse groups of people and a Harvard study shows 26 million participated in protests in 2020.
Protesting at college campuses across the country has been on the rise, with students complaining law enforcement involvement has made matters worse. Gay argued it is important for Mississippians to remember Martin Luther King Jr. and understand protest is at the core of every successful social movement in this country.
"We want our young people to be able to continue to raise their voices," Gay emphasized. "Oftentimes, protest is not pretty. It is intended to disrupt. And as long as people are doing it peacefully, they should be entitled to do so."
Gay stressed the Fifth Circuit decision essentially eliminates the right to organize a mass protest because organizers could be held financially liable if even one protester commits an illegal act.
get more stories like this via email
A new statue at the U.S. Capitol honors Arkansas civil rights activist Daisy Gatson Bates.
The eight foot bronze statue is in the National Statuary Hall.
Bates has a newspaper in her arm, is holding a notebook and a pen, and is wearing a National Association for the Advancement of Colored People stick pin.
She and her husband owned and operated the Arkansas Weekly newspaper - that was devoted solely to telling the stories of the Civil Rights Movement.
Current president of the Arkansas NAACP Barry Jefferson said Bates is best known for her work with the Little Rock Nine - the students who integrated Arkansas public schools in 1957.
"When they was desegregating Little Rock Central High school," said Jefferson, "she stood and fought for that and stood with them and walked them in every single day."
After working with the Little Rock Nine Bates continued to fight for Civil Rights and was a speaker at the March on Washington in 1963.
She was president of the Arkansas NAACP from 1952 to 1961.
Each state can place two sculptures in the Statuary Hall. The Bates statue replaces one of a little-known 19th century Arkansas resident.
The decision to honor Bates had bipartisan support. Jefferson said the move is a sign that Arkansas is evolving.
"It's saying that we're trying to move in the right direction, and rewrite the wrongs that have happened for the state of Arkansas for Black people," said Jefferson, "by presenting her statue at the National Capitol to show that - hey, Arkansas is trying to grow, Arkansas is trying to move forward."
The third Monday in February is Daisy Gatson Bates day in Arkansas. She died in 1999 and was posthumously awarded the Medal of Freedom.
get more stories like this via email
The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas says it is monitoring protests at college campuses, after almost 60 students protesting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were arrested during a demonstration at the University of Texas in Austin.
State troopers on horses and in riot gear were called in to control the crowd. ACLU Staff Attorney Brian Klosterboer said students planning to participate in peaceful protests should know their rights.
"We encourage everyone to follow the guidance of law enforcement even if they believe that law enforcement might be violating their First Amendment or constitutional rights," said Klosterboer. "It's important that people try to stay safe. Remember, they also have a right to remain silent. You can ask if you are free to leave."
Charges were dropped against the protesters in Austin. Students also held a sit-in at the University of Texas in Dallas and a walkout was held at the University of Texas in Arlington.
Following the arrests of the protesters, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said on the social media platform X that the students belonged in jail, and accused them of hate speech.
Klosterboer said when state officials attack free speech, they undermine the core of democracy.
"Texas public universities were specifically designated by Gov. Abbott as traditional public forums," said Klosterboer. "That's where students and others who are engaging in any kind of speech, whether it's passing out Bibles and religious literature or engaging in protests for human rights. That's where free speech is at its apex."
He added that if someone feels their civil liberties have been violated, they can file a complaint on the ACLU website.
The demonstrations in Texas are part of nationwide protests calling for a ceasefire between the Israeli forces and Hamas.
get more stories like this via email